Blind Belief Leading Us Astray From The Truth...
Alien Life & UFO/UAPs
Sunday 21st, April 2024
Over the past few years we have seen many shows and interviews, ranging from amateur to professional and everything in between. And the general theme to all of these shows and interviews regardless of the level or quality of the show is that most if not all content is opinion, hearsay or information from 'a well known' name that has no hard evidence to back up the claims.
This begs the question, are we hurting our pursuit of the truth by rewording and pumping out the same stuff without questioning the how and why of the supposed or reported information that has come to light.
We see a lot of information coming out of FOIA requests or whistle-blowers which has some suggestion of strange conversations and references to aspects that might fit a certain narrative, but do we question the truth and accuracy of these FOIAs and the information released?!
It has been long known that the US government has ran dis-information programs over the years in many different areas, whats to say some if not all the FOIAs or even some of the 'key' information in these released FOIA documents isn't dis-information.
There are large groups of people on the internet that listen to Nick Pope, Steven Greer, Luis Elizondo, George Knapp, Jeremy Corbell, John Greenewald, Jr. etc. and take everything they say as unequivocal truth and fact, full stop, that's it, they hear the words out of these people's mouths, and consider that it is gospel.
Let us clarify for a second, we're not saying some of what these individuals are saying isn't true, we're just saying there is no due diligence by a non-invested party (that we know of).
Lets take the simply case of a person up in court for stealing a car from a street when no one was around to witness it and there were no CCTV cameras. In the same vein as the paranormal community at present, with no evidence, just the police officer's word against the defendant, the police officer says that the defendant stole the car, the judge rules the defendant is guilty and put behind bars.
It just not how courts work (in most cases) or the law for that matter, there is on the ground investigation, maybe multiple different organisations work together and collaborate to find evidence that either convicts or exonerates the defendant.
There needs to be more due diligence, more validating evidence that might come to light and if this is already happening it needs to be out in the open to allow it to be seen and vetted for accuracy and validated by independent parties.
Sure we still don't know what happened to JFK and hes from earth. We believe JFK wasn't an alien, or was he :D
And yes we'll get many people jumping in saying this and that has been released and this person said this etc. bla bla, but that still doesn't support or answer well enough to clarify and unequivocally give us the truth to the many questions.
The stark reality of the matter is we don't really know much, we have a few video of UAPs captured on military hardware, some of the manoeuvres aren't possible with publicly available information, thats really it, everything else is someone said something or this is what I saw but they can't or wont publicly release any supporting evidence.
There are so many compartmentalised areas with the US government alone that hide small parts to an even bigger puzzle that we might never fully see completed. This doesn't even take into consideration what all the other governments are doing around the world with their own secrets.
Maybe the information we're getting now in the realm of UAPs is timed perfectly to detract and mis-direct from a more darker, shadier truth that the world isn't ready to start to contemplate.
It's just something to think over, why now, why by these individuals, why in this way the drips and drabs of this information is being released. How much follow up research, fact checking or validation do you do?!
As Steven King said so well,
This begs the question, are we hurting our pursuit of the truth by rewording and pumping out the same stuff without questioning the how and why of the supposed or reported information that has come to light.
We see a lot of information coming out of FOIA requests or whistle-blowers which has some suggestion of strange conversations and references to aspects that might fit a certain narrative, but do we question the truth and accuracy of these FOIAs and the information released?!
It has been long known that the US government has ran dis-information programs over the years in many different areas, whats to say some if not all the FOIAs or even some of the 'key' information in these released FOIA documents isn't dis-information.
There are large groups of people on the internet that listen to Nick Pope, Steven Greer, Luis Elizondo, George Knapp, Jeremy Corbell, John Greenewald, Jr. etc. and take everything they say as unequivocal truth and fact, full stop, that's it, they hear the words out of these people's mouths, and consider that it is gospel.
Let us clarify for a second, we're not saying some of what these individuals are saying isn't true, we're just saying there is no due diligence by a non-invested party (that we know of).
Lets take the simply case of a person up in court for stealing a car from a street when no one was around to witness it and there were no CCTV cameras. In the same vein as the paranormal community at present, with no evidence, just the police officer's word against the defendant, the police officer says that the defendant stole the car, the judge rules the defendant is guilty and put behind bars.
It just not how courts work (in most cases) or the law for that matter, there is on the ground investigation, maybe multiple different organisations work together and collaborate to find evidence that either convicts or exonerates the defendant.
There needs to be more due diligence, more validating evidence that might come to light and if this is already happening it needs to be out in the open to allow it to be seen and vetted for accuracy and validated by independent parties.
Sure we still don't know what happened to JFK and hes from earth. We believe JFK wasn't an alien, or was he :D
And yes we'll get many people jumping in saying this and that has been released and this person said this etc. bla bla, but that still doesn't support or answer well enough to clarify and unequivocally give us the truth to the many questions.
The stark reality of the matter is we don't really know much, we have a few video of UAPs captured on military hardware, some of the manoeuvres aren't possible with publicly available information, thats really it, everything else is someone said something or this is what I saw but they can't or wont publicly release any supporting evidence.
There are so many compartmentalised areas with the US government alone that hide small parts to an even bigger puzzle that we might never fully see completed. This doesn't even take into consideration what all the other governments are doing around the world with their own secrets.
Maybe the information we're getting now in the realm of UAPs is timed perfectly to detract and mis-direct from a more darker, shadier truth that the world isn't ready to start to contemplate.
It's just something to think over, why now, why by these individuals, why in this way the drips and drabs of this information is being released. How much follow up research, fact checking or validation do you do?!
As Steven King said so well,
The trust of the innocent is the liar's most useful tool.
